A Case of a Visual Field Defect with Optical Coherence Tomography Changes after Sildenafil Citrate Overdose

PURPOSE: A case of a transient visual field defect and a change in spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) after an overdose of sildenafil citrate is described. CASE SUMMARY: A 67-year-old male with no previous medical history presented with a bluish tinge and visual field defect in both eyes. He had consumed eight tablets of sildenafil citrate (800 mg) 3 days before the visit. His best-corrected visual acuity was 14/20 in the right eye and 20/20 in the left eye. No specific finding was noted on slit-lamp examination. Fundus examination and fundus photography revealed focal foveal hypopigmentation in both eyes. He underwent SD-OCT imaging with the Cirrus HD-OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Oberkochen, Germany), and thickening of the ellipsoid zone and choroid was revealed by SD-OCT scans. He was advised not to take any more sildenafil citrate and was followed for 1 week after the first visit. Central scotomas of both eyes were revealed by a visual field test, and thickening of the ellipsoid zone and choroid remained. His eyes were re-evaluated 1 and 3 months after the first visit, and although the symptoms nearly disappeared, abnormalities in the visual field test and on SD-OCT remained, albeit with some degree of improvement. He revisited us 4 months after the first visit, at which time the visual field test and SD-OCT scans showed results within normal ranges. CONCLUSIONS: Sildenafil citrate overdose can result in a color anomaly (bluish tinge), visual field defects, and thickening of the ellipsoid zone and choroid on SD-OCT scans.

Comparison of 1% Prednisolone and 0.1% Bromfenac Solutions for Preventing Macular Edema after Cataract Surgery

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical effectiveness of 1% Prednisolone acetate ophthalmic solution and 0.1% Bromfenac sodium hydrate ophthalmic solution on prevention of cystoid macular edema after cataract surgery. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 349 patients who received phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation in Severance Hospital from July 2013 to January 2016 was performed. In these patients, 192 eyes received 1% Prednisolone acetate ophthalmic solution, and 157 eyes were treated with topical 0.1% Bromfenac sodium hydrate ophthalmic solution. The incidence and severity of cystoid macular edema (CME) were evaluated by retinal foveal thickness on optical coherence tomography for patients who showed best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) less than 0.5 (log MAR ≥ 0.3). RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two groups in age (p = 0.708), sex (p = 0.977), or the side of operated eye (p = 0.443). The two groups showed BCVA 0.04 ± 0.09 (Steroid group) and 0.03 ± 0.07 (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug [NSAID] group) at 1 month after the surgery and the difference was not significant (p = 0.947). One eye in the topical steroid group had cystoid macular edema, and 3 eyes in the steroid group showed elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) over 30 mm Hg. There were no IOP elevations or macular edema in the NSAID group. CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that 0.1% Bromfenac sodium hydrate ophthalmic solution had a similar effect to 1% Prednisolone acetate ophthalmic solution on preventing CME after cataract surgery. This indicates that topical NSAID can be considered along with topical steroids in order to prevent CME after cataract surgery.

Comparison of Toric Foldable Iris-Fixated Phakic Intraocular Lens Implantation and Limbal Relaxing Incisions for Moderate-to-High Myopic Astigmatism

PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness of toric foldable iris-fixated phakic intraocular lens (pIOL) implantation and non-toric foldable iris-fixated pIOL implantation with limbal relaxing incisions (LRIs) for correcting moderate-to-high astigmatism in myopic eyes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of 146 patients (195 eyes) with myopic astigmatism who underwent toric foldable iris-fixated pIOL implantation (toric group; 94 eyes) or non-toric foldable iris-fixated pIOL implantation with concurrent LRIs (LRI group; 101 eyes) were retrospectively reviewed. For subgroup analysis, the two groups were subdivided according to preoperative astigmatic severity [moderate, 2.00 to <3.00 diopters (D); high, 3.00–4.00 D]. Visual and astigmatic outcomes were compared 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The uncorrected distance visual acuity was at least 20/25 in 100% and 98% of the toric and LRI group eyes, respectively. The toric group had lower mean residual cylindrical error (-0.67±0.39 D vs. -1.14±0.56 D; p<0.001) and greater mean cylindrical error change (2.17±0.56 D vs. 1.63±0.72 D; p<0.001) than the LRI group, regardless of the preoperative astigmatic severity. The mean correction index (1.10±0.16 vs. 0.72±0.24; p<0.001) and success index (0.24±0.14 vs. 0.42±0.21; p<0.001) also differed significantly between the groups. CONCLUSION: Both surgical techniques considerably reduced astigmatism and had comparable visual outcomes. However, toric foldable iris-fixated pIOL implantation was more reliable for correcting moderate-to-high astigmatism in myopic eyes.

Comparison of Toric Foldable Iris-Fixated Phakic Intraocular Lens Implantation and Limbal Relaxing Incisions for Moderate-to-High Myopic Astigmatism

PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness of toric foldable iris-fixated phakic intraocular lens (pIOL) implantation and non-toric foldable iris-fixated pIOL implantation with limbal relaxing incisions (LRIs) for correcting moderate-to-high astigmatism in myopic eyes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of 146 patients (195 eyes) with myopic astigmatism who underwent toric foldable iris-fixated pIOL implantation (toric group; 94 eyes) or non-toric foldable iris-fixated pIOL implantation with concurrent LRIs (LRI group; 101 eyes) were retrospectively reviewed. For subgroup analysis, the two groups were subdivided according to preoperative astigmatic severity [moderate, 2.00 to <3.00 diopters (D); high, 3.00–4.00 D]. Visual and astigmatic outcomes were compared 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The uncorrected distance visual acuity was at least 20/25 in 100% and 98% of the toric and LRI group eyes, respectively. The toric group had lower mean residual cylindrical error (-0.67±0.39 D vs. -1.14±0.56 D; p<0.001) and greater mean cylindrical error change (2.17±0.56 D vs. 1.63±0.72 D; p<0.001) than the LRI group, regardless of the preoperative astigmatic severity. The mean correction index (1.10±0.16 vs. 0.72±0.24; p<0.001) and success index (0.24±0.14 vs. 0.42±0.21; p<0.001) also differed significantly between the groups. CONCLUSION: Both surgical techniques considerably reduced astigmatism and had comparable visual outcomes. However, toric foldable iris-fixated pIOL implantation was more reliable for correcting moderate-to-high astigmatism in myopic eyes.

A New Simple Technique for Removal of Subconjunctival Cyst under the Slit Lamp Microscope

PURPOSE: We present a new simple technique to remove subconjunctival cyst under the slit lamp microscope. CASE SUMMARY: A cotton swab was used to verify whether or not the cyst was freely movable under the conjunctiva. After topical anesthesia, we incised the conjunctiva near the cyst using a 30-gauge needle and extracted the cyst through the wound using forceps under the slit lamp microscope. Four cases of subconjunctival cyst were successfully removed with our new technique. During the average five month (2-10 month) follow-up period, there was no recurrence or procedure-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: Some subconjunctival cysts such as an epithelial inclusion cyst which is freely movable without attachment to surrounding tissues can be easily removed with a 30-gauge needle and forceps under the slit lamp microscope. This could be considered as the primary procedure instead of simple aspiration.

The Effectiveness of Lacrimal Trephination for the Treatment of Canalicular Obstruction

PURPOSE: To determine the effectiveness of lacrimal trephination to treat canalicular obstruction. METHODS: Silicone intubation following lacrimal trephination was performed in 38 eyes of 29 patients with epiphora due to canalicular obstruction between December 2005 and October 2009. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed and telephone interviews were performed. The severity of epiphora was graded by Munk's scale, and anatomical improvement was evaluated by postoperative probing and syringing. RESULTS: The procedure was successful in 73.7% of the cases (grade 0 or 1), and 68.4% of the eyes had complete resolution of epiphora (grade 0). The anatomical success rate was 81.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Lacrimal trephination is a simple and effective treatment for canalicular obstructions. Therefore, lacrimal trephination could be performed prior to attempting an invasive conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy.